Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moj (app)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. There is consensus that the subject is notable. Any article cleanup can be carried out directly or via its talk page independently from this AfD. (non-admin closure) — MarkH21talk 22:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

Moj (app)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Highly promotional page created with unreliable sources also, No secondary coverage other than the wave of Tiktok ban. Sonofstar (talk) 08:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Sonofstar (talk) 08:14, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:10, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Strong Keep The article currently lists extraordinarily significant sources from the Financial Express and the Indian Express, which is exceptional for an app. And for good reasons, it's one of the two most downloaded apps in India so far this year. I found so many recent sources with a simple google news search. There is just no case for its deletion. Mottezen (talk) 00:08, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
 * *Comment - Most of the coverage is about the launch when TikTok was banned (and identical). The Zeebiz article seems promotional and influenced by some company provided content. Doesn't have much apart from that. Sonofstar (talk) 15:33, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Most of the coverage is about the launch when TikTok was banned (and identical) This is just false. The Zeebiz article seems promotional and influenced by some company provided content Ok, so one of 5 first hits on google news for this app that day random day last week "seems" promotional. Color me shocked! This is such a ridiculous nomination. Any reasonable user who would have done WP:BEFORE would not have sent this article to AfD. You need to withdraw this nomination. Mottezen (talk) 17:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 13:09, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep per Mottezen, though the Financial Express doesn't seem like a reliable source. CanadianOtaku  Talk Page 20:03, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep: Passed GNG, however "weak" or "promotional" the article appears, that's an issue for the talk page not AFD. Macktheknifeau (talk) 16:42, 18 March 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.