Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mojection


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Both Speedied by Lid - Richard Cavell (talk) 00:58, 31 December 2008 (UTC) (non admin)

Mojection and Moject

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is a neologism and something made up one day. There is no evidence that the term has achieved widespread use. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Richard Cavell (talk) 23:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC) Also nominating ...I agree - Richard Cavell (talk)
 * Delete. Richard Cavell beat me to writing the opening rationale of this AfD. :-) --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:37, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In fact, there is no evidence of usage by anyone other than the creator of this article. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 23:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.