Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moju Chowdhury


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. This was clearly heading for deletion anyway, but there is no need to wait any longer, as it turns out the article was created by a blcok-evading sockpuppeteer. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:02, 10 March 2016 (UTC)

Moju Chowdhury

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable publications, failing relevant guidelines for notability. Unsourced biographical article with negative implications. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:46, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 22:48, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * delete, seems like a personal attack. I do not know the man or anything about him. So perhaps with a rewrite the article could stand. As some people's struggle with drugs/alcohol is notable in the choices they make or things they do. However as it currently stands I believe it should either be deleted or moved into draft space for a rewrite. Krj373*(talk), *(contrib) 22:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)


 * delete - "he's was a Business person, professionals and he spends most of time in Moju Chowdhury Hat this place is his own firstly he founded in 1965, but he was a Alcohol addicted to Drink, is that he can't make this place for populated with work and Fields." Huh? This is total nonsense. JSFarman (talk) 00:24, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - If the subject were still living, this would be speedy deletion territory. Since becoming aware last week of the author's edits at Moju Chowdhury Hat, I've been concerned that there may be a problem of competence. Any suggestions on how to constructively address that are welcome. Worldbruce (talk) 01:50, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:55, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - There is no evidence this person exists. For all we know this is a complete hoax article.Vinegarymass911 (talk) 05:35, 10 March 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.