Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mokujin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of Tekken characters. ✗ plicit  23:39, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Mokujin

 * – ( View AfD View log | [|edits since nomination])

In courtesy for the IP 103.120.117.110 (now user Kazama16). Reason: "Because the sources don't really talk about him and sources are just top 10 Tekken characters, top 11 Tekken characters etc." Additionally, Mokujin hasn't received any commentary at all.


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  GlatorNator  (ᴛ) 22:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  GlatorNator  (ᴛ) 22:52, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge No actual commentary found about the character and the sources don't mainly talk about him. Kazama16 (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge All primary or listicles. "28 of the most favourite video game trees ever." Yeah, no. QuicoleJR (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge to List of Tekken characters: Even though I still don't agree with these mass AFDs, I'm not seeing much for Mokujin that could save his article. He's barely even a character, just a mimic for the other characters in the series. So I don't see how someone like him could get the coverage. MoonJet (talk) 00:50, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Merge per all. The sources support notability for the list of characters, but not individually. Some of this can be selectively moved there, per WP:PRESERVE. Shooterwalker (talk) 13:19, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep. Found a significant and in-depth study that specifically examined Mokujin. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Comment I doubt a single sigcov could be enough for the article to be notable, hence still on for the Merge. GlatorNator  (ᴛ) 17:31, 28 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.