Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moland, Minnesota


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Since this is heading for a snowball keep, I'm closing it. Mgm|(talk) 20:50, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Moland, Minnesota

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

A7: Article about a real place, which does not assert notability. Elm-39 (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep, real place, A7 does not apply. Individual AfD is not the place to address whether or not places are inherently notable - current practice is that they are. DuncanHill (talk) 17:55, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep because the nominator said himself it is a real place. These kind of articles certainly do not meet A7...The only things that DO meet A7 are people, web content/sites, or companies/clubs.  K50   Dude   ROCKS!   18:23, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Firstly, A7 is a CSD criterion, it is irrelevant to AfD. Real place, inherently notable. &mdash; neuro  (talk)  18:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - worth including in a comprehensive reference. Wily D 18:40, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.