Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mole Listening Pearls


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. WaltonOne 16:40, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Mole Listening Pearls

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Since this could be the label for other notable bands, potentially an unknown number, I'd prefer this were examined in detail by AfD than get speedied or fly under the radar with a PROD. Splash - tk 21:35, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: This article seems fine to me. It isn't written as a promotion, and it does have the stub tag. Leave it for someone to expand. Absentis 21:48, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep: It seems like a legit label. I why not leave it? -Haon 23:55, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete notability not asserted. Bigdaddy1981 00:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It is a notable record label, it just may not seem so because most the artists are popular in Germany; however, some artists, such as Wax Tailor, Naomi, Anima Sound System, and De Phazz are somewhat popular in the U.S. and tour in the U.S. Further, objective evidence of notability per WP:N is shown on the talk page and I will expand the article in the next few days. —Christopher Mann McKaytalk 01:34, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If notability is asserted and shown, I'll change my delete vote. Bigdaddy1981 01:54, 14 August 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep per Christopher Mann McKay. Has over 8,000 hits on MSN  and about 50,000 Ghits .  There has to be something notable there. Bearian 16:04, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.