Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molecular Significance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Antibiotic Resistance Profiles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:23, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

Molecular Significance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Antibiotic Resistance Profiles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD (with no explanation) - Article is an essay (see WP:NOTESSAY) and contains referenced statements, mixed with WP:SYNTH based on the article creator's personal opinion. It appears that this article was created as part of a project (see Wiki_Ed/University_of_North_Carolina_Wilmington/History_and_Methods_of_Infectious_Diseases_Research_(Spring_2017)) and when it first appeared in Article space I moved it back to the editor's sandbox, feeling that it was not ready to be a Wikipedia entry. The creator moved it back to article space over the redirect, which is why it appears that I have created this article - I'm definitely not the author. Exemplo347 (talk) 12:07, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete: WP:NOTESSAY; duplicates the subjects Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; last two sections are based on primary sources, so not WP:MEDRS and thus unlikely to be mergable. --HyperGaruda (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete In its current form, this is a scientific paper/essay hybrid, on a too-specific topic, duplicating existing content. My suggestion to the author would be to integrate the new material (what of it is suitable) into the existing article sections pointed out by HyperGaruda above.-- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.