Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molez


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Molez

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no in-depth hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. And no major reviews listed in MobyGames or anywhere else online. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ping me. czar 06:12, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  czar  06:15, 7 December 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:54, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now as my searches simply found even minimally better coverage for a better notable article. Notifying video games users who participated at these AfDs, and  in case they're not aware of this nomination.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't see coverage in reliable sources.  Like Czar, I'm certainly willing to change my vote if someone finds non-English sources.  I did a Google search for .fi sources, but it came up nearly empty. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:49, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails the WP:GNG, not to mention there's virtually no content present to begin with... Sergecross73   msg me  19:35, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete No hits in WP:VG's reliable source custom search (Disregard comment sections), and only hits in WP:VG's situation source custom source are Giant Bomb's own wiki entries. Most Google (non-directory) results seem to only mention it in context of Liero being a clone, and no hits in Google Books. -- ferret (talk)
 * Soft delete as any self-published game with no coverage is non-notable. The official website says "MoleZ became almost legendary, at least in Finland ...", and this game was published in 1997, so I am voting soft delete until someone can provide compelling evidence towards notability. Esquivalience t 02:33, 19 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.