Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mollie Milligan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. There doesn't seem to be any agreement on whether this person meets WP:NACTOR, with the point about whether "multiple" means "two" or "three" seeming to be a sticking point. Whether one of her current projects will turn into a notable production is unknown at this point, perhaps when they have been released we can revisit this discussion. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:41, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Mollie Milligan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This nomination echoes what I said with my now-removed PROD as I initially considered AfD but it looked like an easy PROD but it's now been removed, here we are at AfD. Pinging interested subject users, , and  and I think  may also be interested as it seems this is the same IP who has removed countless other PRODs. SwisterTwister  talk  22:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete. Seems to fail WP:ACTOR. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Can't find anything on her, No evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 09:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep in light of below- Seems to pass NACTOR, Not entirely happy with the sources but hey that should improve as the years go on, – Davey 2010 Talk 13:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom MiracleMat (talk) 08:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Seems to meet WP:NACTOR. The key is what the three words in WP:NACTOR mean: "significant" (roles), "multiple" "notable" (films). Her role in The Gray Man was significant, and the film definitely meets wiki guidelines for notability. Her role in I Spit on Your Grave, which also appears to meet wiki standards for notability. So that's two. It gets problematical after that. Heaven's Rain was a notable film, but I don't think you could call her role in that significant. Same with her role in Rudderless, another notable film. She has a starring role in the television series, Sons of the Brotherhood, but that does not appear to be notable. So, of her already created work, she has significant roles in 2 notable films. So does "2" meet the "multiple" criteria? That's an iffy one. I would say 3 definitely does. So I was on the fence. However, she has significant roles in 2 upcoming films. As per Variety, filming has begun on Three Days in August, which will meet the notability guidelines. In fact, her role in that film is a starring one per this. That was the tipping point to me, with August, to me she clearly passes NACTOR. And she appears to have one of the leading roles in the upcoming film Element.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I've changed my vote to abstain, Onel makes some good points. User:onel5969, you may want to ping other participants of this AfD so they can consider your argument. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging, , and to reconsider, per Piotrus' suggestion.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Changed mine in light of 's !vote. – Davey 2010 Talk 13:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping but I'm simply not seeing how she's nothing more than a background character actress? There's hardly much to suggest better improvement here.  SwisterTwister   talk  20:11, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 04:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  18:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Regarding Onel's justification for leaning "keep" while on the fence: until a film is edited and released it's really tough to gauge how significant/notable it will be. In fact, whose to say either of the two films mentioned will actually find distribution/release. Research into both production companies suggest non-notibility, a sort of film industry equivalent of local theatre. Otherwise, she seems a non-significant low-level performer. Maybe someday she'll achieve genuine notability, but to say so now seems premature. ShelbyMarion (talk) 16:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.