Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Conlin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Dotty Cotton. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:32, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Molly Conlin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

First AfD slightly less than a year ago led to a delete. Notability is more likely now than then because the actress plays a recurring character, and IMDb reports that she has appeared in 35 episodes since the character was introduced.) Eastmain (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC) (categories) * I originally added the article, but on reflection, I think it is a candidate for deletion.  I would disagree with incubation because that relates to articles that need work, not ones which just not be here.  "As a rule, do not incubate an article unless you intend to improve it or you reasonably expect that it will be improved by other editors."  Basically I created this from a red link thinking of the notability of the character (who is undoubtedly notable in the context of the series), not the actor (who is currently not notable, although she might be later). raining girl (talk) 22:49, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. See the first discussion: Articles for deletion/Molly Conlin - Eastmain (talk) 02:21, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  —Eastmain (talk) 02:28, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * An explanation:' At 19:50, 28 December 2009 tagged the article for speedy delete as db-repost. I couldn't determine whether the article was substantially the same as the one which was deleted, or whether the change in circumstances (35 episodes) represented a change in circumstances, so I brought the deletion issue here. - Eastmain (talk) 05:29, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dotty Cotton for the time being. WP:ENTERTAINER requires significant multiple roles - one role in EastEnders is good, but not good enough. All the others seem to be very minor cameos. (Also, I'm wary about having articles for children which don't have the attention of Wiki regulars - they are easy targets for nasty misinformation.) Chris Neville-Smith (talk) 10:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Dotty Cotton per Chris Neville-Smith. But don't worry about the article not having the attention of Wiki regulars - it's been on my watchlist for several months. AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:52, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * INCUBATE Ignoring the currently inaplicable WP:ENT, the child is pushing quite hard at meeting WP:BIO through WP:GNG.  Sure, set a redirect... but send the article to incubation so it can get attention and return without prejudice when it becomes a slam-dunk.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 13:38, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.