Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Emmons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Ty  10:52, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Molly Emmons

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete artist biography sourced solely to her own webpage. No evidence of the "significant coverage" in third party reliable sources that is required to reach WP:N. If every photographer, writer, or such whose works appear in a few publications (once each perhaps) were notable, prolific letter writers to the editor, advertisers and their art designers, and heaven-knows-who-else would be "notable". Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:31, 27 February 2009 (UTC)

Delete looks to be self written with only the artist's webpage as the main source. I think this is a case of self promotion, also "... will graduate in 2009", speaks alot. Arty pants, Babble 16:41, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Delete I declined the speedy because there were asserions of notability but I've been unable to find evidence of significant coverage of *this* Molly. Ghits are false positives and no evidence of notability.  StarM  04:04, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  --  StarM  04:05, 28 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails to establish notability with reliable sources -- Whpq (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.