Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly O'Sullivan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  01:37, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Molly O'Sullivan

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Can't seem to find any sources that aren't primary. Article currently doesn't meet GNG or SIGCOV. Pokelego999 (talk) 01:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Fictional elements and Science fiction and fantasy. Pokelego999 (talk) 01:22, 30 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete. The lack of secondary source material is an issue for WP:BASIC, so the article should be deleted. I'm surprised that this made it through the approval process via AfC. Definitely delete this one UNLESS strong secondary source material can be added to this article. Pumpkinspyce (talk) 01:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Also, I didn't even think of the WP:GNG policy, but I don't think that this article meets that either. Firmly delete unfortunately, UNLESS other folks have some secondary source material to add into the mix here. Pumpkinspyce (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete per Pumpkinspyce. I don't see enough secondary source material to support this article. Shooterwalker (talk) 22:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete generic name, unlikely search term for a redirect Dronebogus (talk) 01:40, 3 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.