Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Rainford


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to Britain's Got Talent (series 6). (non-admin closure) -- Patchy1 05:24, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Molly Rainford

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Didn't win - not notable -- Patchy1 11:32, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - where does it say you have to win the talent show? WP:GNG is still a priority, and           I'm pretty sure it's met. If you want more RS and such found, then I'll go and find some more. The article needs major expansion, but she IS notable. Lukeno94 (talk) 12:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Britain's Got Talent (series 6). No lasting notability outside of this TV show, as per all the other finalists.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 13:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Signing a record deal with Sony of all people is not notability outside of the show? Lukeno94 (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * No.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 19:09, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Yes, it is, but only once she has 2 albums completed, or one of her songs charts nationally. Give it time, and break it out if that happens.   Th e S te ve   10:44, 5 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect per Lugnuts. Having a record deal with a major label doesn't make you notable outside of the TV show. It doesn't matter if you add 50 references to the two sentences in the article, she's still notable for just one event (WP:BLP1E). The article Britain's Got Talent (series 6) already states her age, the fact she is a singer and the position she finished in, so an independent article adds nothing to that. – anemone projectors – 17:57, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Britain's Got Talent (series 6). Living people that are only notable for only one specific event are generally prohibited from having articles, per WP:BLP1E. I concur with the above, as well. TBrandley (what's up) 19:03, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Lugnuts and WP:BLP1E. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 20:56, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 14:25, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Support redirect -- If she acheives something notable in the next five or more years time, we can always reinstate the article. Peterkingiron (talk) 18:32, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.