Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Molly Sweeney, Musician


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 05:00, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

Molly Sweeney, Musician

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

"Contested" prod. Appears to be non-notable singer-songwriter. Apparently has made a few guess appearances in some band's recordings (Land of Kush which itself doesn't have an article). Sources refer to her in passing in the album reviews. Certainly nowhere near enough to pass threshold. The creator has only made edits to this article (and to add her in List of musicians) so possible promotion piece. Christopher Connor (talk) 21:25, 10 July 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  00:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:09, 11 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

Battleaxe9872 Talk 00:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, per this |this search that only shows her myspace page and no 3rd party sources.
 * Delete: the page does not establish notability and a quick googling reveals no notability. The article could establish notability for their band per WP:BAND point 5, if the label is considered major, but the musician is not independantly notable. The title is also wrong, and should be Molly Sweeney (Musician); if the article is kept, it should be moved there. Most probably this is a vanity article. --Falcon Darkstar Momot (talk) 00:40, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - I did the move as suggested by Falcon above, just in case the article survives. But I don't think it should because Ms. Sweeney has not yet gained enough notice for her achievements in order to be the subject of an encyclopedic article. WP:PROMO is probably the real issue here. -- D OOMSDAYER 520  (Talk|Contribs) 17:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.