Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mollygood


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect NAC  Reyk  YO!  03:21, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Mollygood
Was a contested prod. Anyways, this is an article on a website that blogs about celebrities. There is plenty of them out there and I do not see how this stands out from the crowd of these celeb-blogs. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 19:55, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Fulfills criteria #3 of WP:WEB, namely that it is published through the very notable online publisher, Jossip, which has been covered by the NY Times, NY Post, Wired Mag, etc. etc. etc. Yes, there are plenty of gossip blogs, but this is actually one of the notable ones. Rock star  ( T/C ) 20:00, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Then should it redirect to Jossip then? User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 20:03, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Works for me. Right now, Jossip redirects to Trent Vanegas. That said, Jossip is well notable enough (with lots of independent coverage) for its own page, and Venegas apparently doesn't even write. So for the time being, why don't we redirect it to Trent Vanegas and I'll get cracking on a separate Jossip page in a little while. Rock star  ( T/C ) 20:15, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * What was trying to get at is this: while Jossip is pretty notable, I am not sure if Mollygood, just being published by Jossip, is notable on its own. If you wish to work on the Jossip article, go right ahead and if no one comes by this AFD, I can close it. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 20:22, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I understood your original point, which is why in the Jossip article I would include a section on Mollygood. I think that satisfies all problems. Mollygood technically does satisfy C#3 of WP:WEB, but I do think a merge would be more appropriate. What I was saying is that because there is no Jossip article currently, we should just redirect Mollygood to the Trent Venegas article for the time being, thereby preserving the history and the information. When the time comes that either I or another editor writes the article on Jossip, I will redirect Mollygood to Jossip. Does that sound okay? You can go ahead and close the AfD, I think. But if you want to leave it open, that's fine too. Rock star  ( T/C ) 20:34, 12 July 2007 (UTC)
 * That works, closing AFD now. User:Zscout370 (Return Fire) 20:57, 12 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.