Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mon (monster)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Close, but being unsourced was the final straw. Proto /// type  09:14, 29 June 2006 (UTC)

Mon (monster)
Irrelevant suffix, not a meme; article attempts to create some sort of phenomenon where none exists Kuronue 19:20, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Digimon, digital mosnters, digimon are teh...uh...Delete per nom. Hbdragon88 20:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. RedRollerskate 20:45, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Though, I've seen the term used interchangeably with mob on MUDs. -Dawson 21:10, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I haven't. Delete. -  Che Nuevara: Join the Revolution 23:32, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --Coredesat 23:33, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep we have how many anime articles about 'mon' something? This article needs improvement, yes, but I feel such an article as this is not inappropriate. I'm a bit confused at the nomination, not a meme? who's calling it a meme? If I recall, there was a huge phenomenon of children monster anime, and still is, not just in Pokemon or Digimon. I'm against fancrufy type stuff, myself, but this is far from it.  Ask a group of parents who had kids go though the Pokemon craze what a "mon" is, they'll probably be able to give you an answer! -- Ned Scott 05:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Hmm, unless it could be considered WP:OR... hmmm.. now I'm not so sure.. -- Ned Scott 10:59, 28 June 2006 (UTC)


 * Keep, revalent but needs improvment--Eldarone 22:19, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep legitimate anime genre, linked from several pages, does need cleanup, though. Circeus 14:51, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I made a note at WP:ANIME about this, if only because if somebody can tell whether this is OR or not, and clean it up, it's them. Circeus 14:55, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.