Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Greenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 03:36, 20 August 2011 (UTC)

Mona Greenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is not inherited. She is not in the slightest bit notable enough for Wikipedia. Atomician (talk) 16:18, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator, per above. Atomician (talk) 16:20, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - i agree with Atomician that she is not notable enough for wikipedia and that she should be deleted. Tony (talk) 17:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete To be specific, there's no evidence she conforms to WP:NACTOR or WP:GNG. The sources mention her only in the context of her husband, therefore any relevent and citeable information relating to this individual should be placed in the Karl Malden article. ŞůṜīΣĻ ¹98¹ Speak 18:31, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination.  Pinkadelica ♣  00:19, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 02:05, 13 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect this stub to Karl Malden where this person is already mentioned. While she is sourcable, she does not merit a seperate article.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 21:43, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Karl Malden per MichaelQSchmidt. Kind of on the fence between redirect and delete, since the Malden article says little about her, but redirects are cheap and the redirect may serve a purpose to some users. Rlendog (talk) 20:25, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Only reason I didn't choose redirect was that no-one knows who she is... you'd never type her name in. Second rate actor's wife doesn't even deserve a redirect article :/ Atomician (talk) 20:27, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.