Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mona Przanowska


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 22:42, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Mona Przanowska

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:GNG, very poorly sourced. This is a case study for WP:BLP violations. Kleuske (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. Kleuske (talk) 20:40, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Women, Royalty and nobility,  and Poland.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 20:54, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. The unsourced fantasy claims of holding long-extinct noble titles and mostly-redlinked genealogy have to go. And if all you can say about her academic career is the vague and unsourced "professor at multiple schools in Sweden as well as in the United Kingdom", then that's not good enough for WP:PROF either, and Google Scholar turns up nothing relevant. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:13, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * I get more hits Googling myself (3,160) than I do for the Grand Princess (406.) I tried to find any scholarly articels or papers she may have published but got nothing. Pascalulu88 (talk) 22:02, 11 July 2023 (UTC)
 * The whole article violates WP:V. Two of the three footnotes don't even mention the subject and the third one is some self-published page saying only that someone with the similar name Mona Perzanowska paints watercolors. Google suggests that someone with a similar name is a Swedish high school teacher. Google has zero hits outside Wikipedia for the spelling of the name used in the article. For all I can tell this could be a hoax by a Swedish high schooler centered around the name of their teacher. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not seeing how this meets NBIO, seems like some version of nobility WP:FANCRUFT with WP:OR issues. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 04:39, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Definitely not notable on own merits, and no meaningful sourcing of the multiple nobility/royalty titles, even disregarding that notability is not inherited. Also, most likely WP:COI issues; for example, the photo in the article is claimed to be the creator's "own work", based on subject's old passport photo. Creator has also recently added lots of dubiously sourced information to related articles, such as the subject's ancestor supposedly being an illegitimate child of Alexander I of Russia. Hqb (talk) 13:44, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Swedish news sources return nothing. The subjects own homepage linked in the bio gives no hints of anything conferring notability. Draken Bowser (talk) 08:21, 14 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.