Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monarch Learning Center


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. This could certainly be added to Redding School District, but given the lack of sourcing, a straight merge doesn't seem viable. -- RoySmith (talk) 20:57, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

Monarch Learning Center

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NSCHOOL this article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NORG. WP:BEFORE revealed only WP:ROUTINE coverage and brief mentions, nothing that meets WP:SIGCOV which addresses the subject directly and in depth and is an WP:IS. The article contains no references or external links to assist with WP:BEFORE  // Timothy ::  talk  06:49, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 07:51, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete there are no 3rd party sources. This is also an insanely small school, less than 150 students at a time. If this school was notable, than every elementary school ever at least that had existed since 2000 and created a website would be notable. We do not want to go down that path, that path leads to madness.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:08, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Redding School District per WP:ATD. MB 01:17, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment: I don't believe unreferenced material should be merged into articles, but I have no objection to a merge if a reference is added by the person doing the merge.  // Timothy ::  talk  01:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)   // Timothy ::  talk  01:43, 31 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.