Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monarch henchmen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Feezo (send a signal | watch the sky) 06:21, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Monarch henchmen

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable fictional characters. This article has only one source, not enough sources to establish the notability. No real world coverage to provide it. JJ98 (Talk)  08:40, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Again in-universe trivia. Fans already know, others don't care. Kitfoxxe (talk) 10:38, 16 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:24, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Logan Talk Contributions 00:10, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into one of the lists of characters, trimming content as appropriate. No valid reason for deletion given. Jclemens (talk) 22:29, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eduemoni↑talk↓ </b> 03:12, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep I dont go in for this stuff but so much has gone in to this article it deserves to exist until someone can reference it - definitely a keep. Mark   Dask  19:01, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Unreferenced fancruft of which the 2 most "notable" are already listed in the article describing "The Monarch". Hasteur (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge severely lacking references, which makes it impossible to WP:verify notability. Shooterwalker (talk) 03:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Fails Wikipedia's notability guidelines for fictional characters. Neelix (talk) 18:44, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete- the article is 100% unreferenced plot summary. There are no sources in the article and none can be found. There is nothing to be retained here, neither as a stand-alone article or by stuffing cruft into other articles. Reyk  <sub style="color:blue;">YO!  22:39, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.