Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monash University Malaysia Students Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. --Core desat 00:49, 30 October 2007 (UTC)

Monash University Malaysia Students Association

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

A non-notable student's association, citing no independent sources with lots of OR for good measure. → AA (talk) — 13:58, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.  -- Canley 15:34, 24 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:ORG and nom -- no third-party sources. -David Schaich Talk/Cont 18:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep This appears to be the peak studet association for a university in Malaysia. I would think that in most cases these bodies would be able to assert notability.  That said, large chunks of the article are largely lifted from here. -- Mattinbgn\talk 20:17, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: I believe there is general consensus that student organizations at particular schools or universities are generally not notable. This follows from the WP:ORG guidelines on "organizations whose activities are local in scope".  I should have mentioned this in my comments above.  -David Schaich Talk/Cont 20:49, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article's title refers to Malaysian students but this is about a students association for a campus of Monash University. No sources are given for the article. I would be inclined to keep if the article was properly named and the article was sourced. Capitalistroadster 03:08, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment The title refers to the Student Association of Monash University Malaysia (note "Malaysia" not "Malaysian"). Would a move to Monash University Student Association (Malaysia) be less ambiguous? -- Mattinbgn\talk 03:16, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
 * If notability can be established per WP:ORG, then that would be more appropriate. However, a local student's union must show sufficient secondary sources to establish notability. → AA (talk) — 11:00, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Of course it would. However Capitalistroadster commented about an poor article name and my comment related to that. -- Mattinbgn\talk 22:24, 26 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, WP:ORG and for OR. If there is anything of value, it can be merged back into the school article.  However in no case should this be kept.  Vegaswikian 21:24, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.