Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monashee Spirits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Star  Mississippi  03:59, 18 January 2024 (UTC)

Monashee Spirits

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I'm not sure this has enough WP:SIGCOV to make the cut. It looks like a mix of local coverage, passing mentions and non-RSes like WP:FORBESCON. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:00, 21 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Agreed, sources such as "VancouverIsAwesome" don't make the cut for significant sources. Recommend for deletion. UptonSincere (talk) 01:38, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 03:59, 4 January 2024 (UTC) Relisting comment: Final relist. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NotAGenious (talk) 06:14, 11 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies,  and Canada.  WC  Quidditch   ☎   ✎  01:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: This is about the best I could find, . Coverage is too local to count, and it's mostly just "come visit the cool local distillery". Oaktree b (talk) 01:50, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify. The page is new, so it makes sense. Suitskvarts (talk) 11:05, 27 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep with a tag for more references: I feel deleting the page is a harsh move, because the subject has many references in the local publications and covered deeply in most of them. Even it has non trival moderate coverage by Washington Post. Plus won the Canadian Artisan awards and fulfills the WP:GNG that deleting it would be harsher move. I do not know much than you professional Wikipedians but I rather suggest you to see the references again in detail. I suggest an admin to tag it with the notices for more references to be added for confirming its notability or to draftify it. Zagol Ethiopia (talk) 11:27, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Draftify. The page is new, as indicated above. Bduke (talk) 02:24, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Draftify seems like WP:TOOSOON, local coverage. TLA  (talk) 06:15, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Agree with the above to Draftify this article to allow more time to come up with good sources. Jacona (talk) 18:58, 17 January 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.