Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monastic remains


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Rjd0060 (talk) 14:51, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

Monastic remains

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Submitted anonymously, untouched for over 2 years, looks like a prank. Does "The Geologist" even exist? Not at List_of_scientific_journals_in_earth_and_atmospheric_sciences --tcsetattr (talk / contribs) 03:34, 31 August 2008 (UTC) *Weak Keep- I did manage to find something on Monastic remains from reputable or civilian sources. This page does need MAJOR rewriting, however. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 05:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Short, poorly written and unreferenced article. Absolutely no assurance of notability. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 03:54, 31 August 2008 (UTC))
 * Delete- Seems like a hoax now. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 17:07, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * You can find something on monastic remains, yes, since monastic and remains are real words and the phrase makes sense. But anything resembling the definition in this article? "monastack"?! --tcsetattr (talk / contribs) 06:18, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence that there is any such thing as monastack, and clearly the hits on "monastic remains" refers to monasteries.   Looks like a hoax to me.  Richard Pinch (talk) 11:43, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I took a stab at trying to find something that resembles this article, but it does look like a hoax here.  - Jameson L. Tai   talk  ♦  contribs  18:32, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. WikiScrubber (talk) 13:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Geologists love these areas"? Seems like a hoax to me.  TN ‑ X - Man  18:05, 1 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:18, 3 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.