Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mondago


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted as G11. Patar knight - chat/contributions 00:57, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Mondago

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company is not notable, I can find no reliable sources and those on the article are insufficient to establish any sort of notability.  Nik the  stunned  10:33, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Company may or may not be notable, but it's products are. They are used by many (perhaps as much as half) of the PBX manufacturers and as a result many users are using the software, mostly without knowing so.


 * Also the company is, by far, the global leading authority on PBX/CTI integration. No-one else comes close to provide as many PBX integrations. (http://www.mondago.com/pbx) They are also a leading authority on the TAPI protocol. However, for contractual reasons, most of this work is deliberately private. —  Socnet (talk • contribs) 11:09, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You got any third party sources to support this? I can't find any reliable sources for their products either (not that the would inherit that notability anyways).  Nik the  stunned  11:31, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * You would need to search for "Mondago" and not "Tiger Software", I guess. I found quite a few within a short period of looking. You can mostly tell them from the "privacy policy" references or legal texts. But here are three different kinds of reference (search on the page for "Mondago"):
 * Savance
 * Samsung
 * SpliceCom
 * — Socnet (talk • contribs) 17:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Press releases are not reliable sources and are not any indication of notability.  Nik the  stunned  16:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Perhaps they are not an indication of "notability" but also note that it's not their (Mondago's) press release. It is just one reference of someone (SpliceCom in this case) who claim to use their technology. The other references (also by Mondago's apparent customers) are again just a couple of the high profile companies that use their technology. --Socnet (talk) 18:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 11:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)


 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above deletion debate is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the talk page of either this nomination or the nominated user). No further edits should be made to this page.