Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monday Morning Apocalypse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Evergrey discography.  Sandstein  11:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Monday Morning Apocalypse

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails WP:NALBUM. The coverage that I found of this album appears to mostly consist of passing mentions, not satisfying the "multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent from the musician or ensemble who created it." of criterion #1. There has been no evidence that it charted to pass #2 either. The SandDoctor Talk 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC); expanded 17:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  The SandDoctor  Talk 04:23, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 06:40, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep: Notable album by a notable band. Heiko Gerber (talk) 17:00, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Expanded rationale. There is no evidence for an individual article on this album. -- The SandDoctor Talk 17:11, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge all albums to Evergrey discography. The track listings can be condensed into collapsed templates there. BD2412  T 19:14, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
 * I have no objection to this. -- The SandDoctor Talk 03:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep: Per Heiko Gerber. I found some reliable sources which talk about the album:, , , , and . With these, the album is good enough to pass WP:NALBUM.  ASTIG😎  (ICE T • ICE CUBE) 16:00, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
 * seaoftranquility appears to be a forum post(?) in a source of questionable notability is not RS per WP:ALBUMAVOID
 * herokuapp this claims to be blabbermouth but isn't even on the blabbermouth website? That raises red flags for me.
 * metal-archives is an unreliable source, per WP:ALBUMAVOID and WikiProject Metal
 * metal-experience is an interview, which does nothing for notability and is a zine, which is WP:SPS
 * albumoftheyear must admit that I am not sure of this website, but note that it has no critic reviews and only user generated ratings, making it no better than (most of) imdb.
 * stormbringer identifies itself as a zine, which concerns me when it comes to assessing it for reliability per WP:SPS. Self-published sources are concerning for notability sake.
 * Overall, this album appears to run into problems with WP:NOTINHERETED, WP:NRV, and a general lack of non-trivial coverage in multiple reliable publications. -- The SandDoctor Talk 05:41, 15 October 2020 (UTC); updated 18:05, 18 October 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 23:20, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge with Evergrey discography. Fails WP:GNG. I agree with TheSandDoctor's assessment of the sources posted by Superastig. I also searched every source deemed reliable at WP:A/S that also had a focus on metal and I only found one review . I also searched Google, JSTOR, NYT and this article in other wiki languages but could not find additional sources. Merging this content will allow the information to be published in a more appropriate article. Z1720 (talk) 00:18, 22 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Comment also worth noting that "albumoftheyear" is currently under review as a source. -- The SandDoctor Talk 22:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge per Z1720 --17jiangz1 (talk) 07:45, 31 October 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.