Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mondeca


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  23:47, 25 October 2021 (UTC)

Mondeca

 * – ( View AfD View log )

This company does not seem to have any coverage at all, beyond data scrapers and auto-generated or user-generated business profiles. No sources to be found in the article and I found difficulty finding anything but press releases and user-generated content in my own search. I do see that it has appeared in industry journals, but after digging deeper, all I can see are some passing mentions. If the article were to be rewritten (which I believe it would need to be if it were to follow MOS), it would need reliable, independent, third-party sources to support its notability. Pyrrho the Skeptic (talk) 17:20, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 17:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete: I found no reliable source for it and the article does not have any reference at all. It won't pass the notability guidelines for companies and organizations. Mommmyy (talk) 18:12, 21 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.