Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mondo (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Nomination withdrawn.  Catfish Jim  &#38; the soapdish '' 09:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)

Mondo (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No verifiable sources for this article. The only sources the article cites are self-published sources (see WP:SPS). I have tried doing searches, but all that I can find are more self-published sources, and no verifiable sources. Inks.LWC (talk) 08:55, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

The nominator needs to know that there exists a site named IMDB. And the references cited are not self published sources, but rather an article from the San Francisco Chronicle and IMDB for its plot synopsis. I think one can find more writeups on warfares such as this than the article pages, going by the way this nominator is hellbent on raising such alarms. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manorathan (talk • contribs) 09:17, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

The nominator's claim that the citations are insufficient would then have to call for deletion of many other wikipedia pages for movies which cite only their IMDB pages and sometimes, rotten tomatoes pages as reference. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Manorathan (talk • contribs) 10:41, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  —Manorathan (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions.  —Manorathan (talk) 18:44, 14 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep. Full length reviews in multiple sources, including NYT, NY Daily News, and boston globe. Please read WP:BEFORE Bongo   matic  10:08, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep enough of reliable references.--Diameter (talk) 21:53, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep as well--and if the nominator doesn't withdraw soon, then I call for SNOW. Thanks Bongo, and thanks MQS also, Drmies (talk) 02:18, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Speedy SNOW Keep per a deletion nomination that seems to unfortunately show a lack of WP:BEFORE. It was not the least bit difficult to find that this film has had international distribution and significant coverage in multiple of multiple of reliable sources over a many-years period.  We do not delete notable topics out of a nominator's lack of diligent before. I urge the nominator to re-familiarize himself with WP:DEL, WP:DEL, and WP:DEL  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 03:14, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Nomination withdrawn Inks.LWC (talk) 20:30, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.