Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monet Stunson


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. The arguments for deletion outweigh the arguments for retention given, in which the latter mainly consist of notability claims without making efforts to pinpoint any sources establishing that. –MuZemike 01:32, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

Monet Stunson

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Notability is primarily based on making it to Big Brother week two, and the sources on the article and in Google News are low quality. John Vandenberg (chat) 10:55, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 11:19, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:23, 24 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - Having a small part in a music video and participating in Big Brother does not really establish notability. The sources provided are of poor quality and are unreliable. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 14:51, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - I think the subject is very notable. Falls under WP:BIO, model, actress, beauty queen. Sources and links could be updated and changed so that's really no problem. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 19:38, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - per our policy on biographies of living people, that lack of sourcing is really a problem. -- Whpq (talk) 18:07, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete On three episodes of TV and a runner-up beauty queen. Ton of links on social websites, but no reliable, independent refs about her.  Fails WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG Bgwhite (talk) 04:29, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment how does this fail WP:NMODEL? It doesn't. The sources need to be updated that's it. This article falls under WP:BIO, WP:NMODEL. I also disagree with you saying it doesn't fall under WP:GNG because it does.☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 04:35, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:05, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * No Consensus This article has enough resources for WP:MODEL, it's just poorly written. Sinfully Wickid (talk) 01:52, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 04:50, 8 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete for reasons already stated. Aequo (talk) 07:40, 8 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment which reason? Article is suitable under WP:NMODEL and WP:GNG. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 00:51, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * No Consensus WP:NMODEL, WP:GNG. Television actor, notable game show contestant. Beauty queen runner up. Theres a ref that needs to be fixed but other than that, I don't see anything wrong with this article. If you do some good searching you will find some good links I'm sure. Sinfully Wickid (talk) 04:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - Good links? If you have any, then please put them forward. -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - I cannot find the significant coverage that would establish general notability. I did find this little time.  As for meeting WP:NMODEL, (1) she has not had significant roles, (2) I see no indication of a large fan base or cult following (3) I see no unique, prolific, or innovative contribution which would indicate that none of the points for inclusion on the criteria for models (really entertainers in general) are met. -- Whpq (talk) 18:06, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 *  Keep /Comment - You just contradicted yourself. You said this falls under WP:NMODEL and then you say it doesn't. She is a multiracial promotional model. She has a big fanbase towards being on music videos and Reality Television. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 18:45, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - Please, only one !vote per customer. I did not contradict myself.  I just indicated that I evaluated this article against the guidelines of WP:GNG, and WP:NMODEL as they are the most applicable with respect to notability.  In evaluating against the criteria listed under those guidelines, I was unable to establish that the subject met any of the points listed in the guideline.  If you have reliable sources that establish that she has "a big fanbase towards being on music videos and Reality Television", then please present them.  I'm always open to re-evaluating my position when presented with new sources. -- Whpq (talk) 18:58, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Reply - I apologize for that. I don't like to argue with other wiki members. I think the article falls under what others are saying it lacks. I will try my best to update the refs and make sure they are properly sourced. ☼Phrasia☼ (talk) 06:05, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.