Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moneta Nova


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect can be created editorially.  Sandstein  10:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)

Moneta Nova

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A number of editors have worked on this page since 2001 but it is still an unreferenced stub. All the attempts to reference it or develop it have come to nothing, so the topic can’t be notable.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 10:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! Baby miss  fortune 10:23, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete -- It looks like a useless stub to me. Is there a potential redirect target?  Peterkingiron (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2017 (UTC)
 * The persistance of "moneta" for money into medieval coinage could possibly be mentioned at Moneta. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Moneta which is a brief section I added based on a reference I first added at this article. As the phrase "moneta nova" does appear on many coins, I think it is a reasonable search term in its own right and the article history does contain at least one potentially interesting reference in Danish that someone who wanted to add to this might look up. 24.151.116.12 (talk) 17:11, 31 December 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.