Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MoneyGram

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. &mdash;Korath (Talk) 01:26, Mar 26, 2005 (UTC)

MoneyGram
Looks awfully spammy. Might be salvagable, but I'm not sure how. -- Scott ei&#960;  03:05, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, advert. &mdash; &#1051;&#1080;&#1074;&#1072;&#1081; | &#x263a; 03:05, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. Notable competitor of Western Union, at least in my area. Vote will change to Strong Keep if the article is de-spamified and expanded. I might try to salvage this one myself. android&harr;talk 05:30, Mar 20, 2005 (UTC)
 * Cleanup Real product, but definitely needs work. Chris 17:53, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - real product, deserves article. Needs cleanup, though - David Gerard 19:29, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Clean up and keep. &mdash;Caesura 21:47, 20 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep World famous business. Marked "cleanup" and categorised to "business". Wincoote 10:06, 21 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep and make into a more neutral article about the company. - Marcika 04:42, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep but why a business and not a company, or is it both? They have a stock ticker.  Maybe the page is misnamed and should be MoneyGram International with a redirect from the current page.Vegaswikian 08:20, 25 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.