Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Money Brothers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus defaulting to Keep and w/o prejudice to a future renomination. Ad Orientem (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Money Brothers

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:BAND. The age-old cycle I ProD'd, an anon deProD'd. — usernamekiran (talk)  23:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC) --- does that ring any bell? — usernamekiran (talk)  23:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The band has released a music video, and have release a total of 5 songs. they are a legitimate band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.201.69.42 (talk) 23:43, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I tried to find sources, i couldnt. Would you please add some sources in the article? — usernamekiran (talk)  23:47, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arizona-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:51, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

Delete: No references and Fails WP:BAND Deathlibrarian (talk) 02:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep or merge to Escape The Fate. There are references under their new name Beyond Unbroken (seriously, did people saying "there's no references" read the first sentence of the article and try searching under the new name?), including a substantial article in Alternative Press (magazine) and some shorter notices on other sites. It might still be better to merge, though, as there's not a huge amount of coverage. --Colapeninsula (talk) 09:10, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:48, 8 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:12, 15 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.