Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongelli incest case


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. WP:SNOW (non-admin closure) KuroiShiroi (contribs) 20:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Mongelli incest case

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Not notable, doesn't meet WP:NOTNEWS and WP:ONEEVENT. Spring and Port Wine (talk) 21:36, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per coverage in most news agencies, per Fritzl case and per hasty nomination.--MarkusBJoke (talk) 21:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per above. Seems like a story that will grow and grow.--Judo112 (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Article seems to be referenced. Wacko Jack O   22:10, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as sufficiently important with major international coverage that seems very likely to continue. DGG (talk) 02:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per DGG. Kittybrewster  &#9742;  14:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.