Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongo Wrestling Alliance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. No prejudice against speedy renomination due to the low level of participation. — Mr. Stradivarius  (have a chat) 14:17, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Mongo Wrestling Alliance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

A search for reliable, secondary sources reveals an insufficient amount of significant coverage. This 11-minute television series fails Wikipedia's general notability guideline. Notability is not inherited, and all articles require a demonstration of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources; our guidelines are quite clear on this point. Furthermore, its full run was 10 11-minute episodes, which would not grant inherent notability even if there were such a thing. Neelix (talk) 02:36, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 17:17, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 11:41, 13 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:28, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

 *Delete as nominator - Notability is not inherited, and all articles require a demonstration of significant coverage in reliable, secondary sources; our guidelines are quite clear on this point. Furthermore, its full run was 10 11-minute episodes, which would not grant inherent notability even if there were such a thing. Neelix (talk) 14:05, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep Aired on a national cable network for a full run. Passes WP:N easily, even if it only aired for one season (sources are needed, but it's obvious an Adult Swim show easily has notability even without any).  Nate  • ( chatter ) 01:52, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Nominators should never add a delete vote as this is indicated by nominating the article for deletion. I have moved this to your initial AfD nomination comment. SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SwisterTwister   talk  06:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Redirect to List of Adult Swim programs. I've found three sources, but ultimately that's all that I could really find for this show and I don't think three sole sources show notability enough to merit an article. Notability isn't inherited by airing on Adult Swim. It generally didn't get much notice from the public at large as far as reliable sources go. If someone could find one more in-depth source, I'd be willing to potentially change my vote. It's just that everything else I've found has either been non-reliable, primary, or a "junk" hit. Everything else has been in passing and there's not a lot of those either. I'm voting for a redirect to the list of programs since redirects are cheap, although it may be worthwhile to keep the history in case more sources are found.Tokyogirl79 (talk) 10:19, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.