Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongol Army


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 03:02, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Mongol Army

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article was created in 2006 and still remains in the sorry state it is currently in. It's un-categorised, un-referenced, and barely contains any information. I'm nominating it for AfD but only lean weakly to deletion; mostly I want to bring it to other editors' attention to determine if it ought to be deleted. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 20:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete unless sourced. I am unable to find any reference to such a force under this name. Perhaps it has another formal name, or is not a notable subset. Seems to fail WP:V at any rate. --Dhartung | Talk 21:37, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Obviously I was looking the wrong places with the wrong search terms. --Dhartung | Talk 06:27, 23 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep existed, , , but not much of an article. JJL (talk) 21:43, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions.   —Nick Dowling (talk) 22:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep This unit existed, and is certainly large enough to be considered automatically notable. I agree that the article needs a ton of work, but this is a viable stub. --Nick Dowling (talk) 22:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep If there are sources, it can be expanded. Ðysepsion † Speak your mind 23:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. State of the article notwithstanding (as that can be improved and fixed via methods other than deletion), the subject was large enough to be considered notable and did in fact exist. Celarnor Talk to me  23:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Article needs to be improved not deleted.LZ (talk) 03:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep - Being a poor stub is not grounds for deletion, but for improvement. Alternatively merge with the puppet state whose national army it was supposed to be.  Peterkingiron (talk) 01:15, 27 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.