Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mongolian Death Worm (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SK, nomination withdrawn and no outstanding delete !votes. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 00:07, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Mongolian Death Worm (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

PROD template removed by the article's author. This article is 90% an overdetailed plotline of a film on a satellite TV channel. What is missing is any evidence of reliable reviews or coverage. The author admits it was not noticed by the major film-comment website. Looks like a film that more or less went straight to DVD. I've searched online and cannot spot any journalistic coverage (only a couple by single author websites). Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFILM. Sionk (talk) 00:21, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Musa  Talk  00:31, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. It took a little while, but I found a ton of reviews for the film. I'm mildly surprised that Twitch Film reviewed this one, but apparently they did. Sionk, you willing to withdraw? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:34, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:52, 1 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The added reviews are good enough to establish notability. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 10:09, 2 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Nomination withdrawn on the basis that if the sources recently discovered by Tokyogirl79 were in the article at the time I found it, I wouldn't have bothered nominating it for Afd. Well rescued! Sionk (talk) 19:19, 2 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have to admit, I was fairly surprised that there were reviews out there. The SyFy films tend to fall within two categories: everyone falls all over them like Sharknado or they're almost solidly ignored. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:12, 3 December 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.