Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moni (company)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)

Moni (company)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

An advertorially-toned page on an unremarkable private company. Significant RS coverage not found; what comes up is passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. Does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. The company has 15 employees (according to the article) and its claim to faim seems to be being part of a startup accelerator program. This is an insufficient claim of significance. Created by Special:Contributions/Thekingsof56 with no other contributions outside this topic. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:39, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 04:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. KCVelaga (talk) 04:17, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, AmericanAir88(talk) 01:37, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA article on a former start-up company. It obtained standard coverage for its product proposition and participation in accelerator programmes, etc., but I am not seeing the necessary in-depth coverage of the company in itself. The company founder appears to have moved to a role at Facebook around the time that this venture closed, but neither that nor anything located in searches meets the notability criteria. AllyD (talk) 07:57, 13 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Wikipedia isn't a platform for promotion, fails WP:SPIP. I cannot find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, references fail WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG and NCORP.  HighKing++ 18:41, 16 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.