Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Connell


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  MBisanz  talk 01:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Monica Connell

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable writer. Most of the article is based upon SUR, apparently a tourist newspaper for English tourists in Spain.  DGG ( talk ) 04:46, 12 October 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Weak Keep Writer of 'Against a Peacock sky' a quite well known book — Preceding unsigned comment added by JohnTombs48 (talk • contribs) 10:42, 12 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - the book may(?) be notable, but there isn't any evidence here from the references provided that its author is.  Velella  Velella Talk 10:52, 12 October 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:37, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:17, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Weak keep The author and book appear notable, but there is a lack of sources in the article which prove this. { MordeKyle }   &#9762;  20:20, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment There are several journals that I don't have access to which review her work: Atlantic (02769077); Jul91, Vol. 268 Issue 1, p113-113, 1/9p, Far Eastern Economic Review; July 4 1991, Vol. 153, p32-32, 1p, and TLS; March 8 1991, p23-23, 1p. I retrieved the listings from EBSCOhost. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:14, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as not convincing for WP:AUTHOR considering there's no actual substance of sources, and nothing else coming close to suggest an otherwise equivalent of better. SwisterTwister   talk  21:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.