Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Elman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e deckertalk 14:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Monica Elman

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable dermatologist, with multiple unverified claims. The only verified material here that might indicate notability is joint authorship of a single textbook.  DGG ( talk ) 14:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:02, 18 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. Lacks indicia of notability. Epeefleche (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  16:11, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per above - no evidence of notability, Fails GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 22:42, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. The Jerusalem Post cites her here, her book only has 1 customer review here (not an official test but an indication of a lack of notability for me). Overall, thinking the sources and references are not there, although it is possible there are more sources in (1) Israeli media or (2) dermatology journals. These I have not checked so I could change my view here.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 00:30, 27 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless somebody very quickly finds sources in Hebrew or Romanian that we can add here, this appears to be little more than a resume.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.