Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monica Sweetheart


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:19, 4 April 2018 (UTC) 
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 20:46, 3 April 2018 (UTC)

Monica Sweetheart

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A BLP that lacks sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail. Significant RS coverage not found. The article is cited to online directories, industry publicity materials, and other sources otherwise not suitable for notability. Does not meet WP:PORNBIO / WP:NACTOR. No notable contributions to the genre. The award category, "FICEB Ninfa Award winner – Best Supporting Actress" is not significant. The rest are nominations. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:47, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:24, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Czech Republic-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:28, 27 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of notability, Hasnt won any notable awards, Fails PORNBIO & GNG. – Davey 2010 Talk 02:44, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep As discussed here, I believe the article can be expanded.Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately without references I can't support my position.Guilherme Burn (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2018 (UTC)


 * Audience knowledge is original research and we don't base articles on that. If its not sourced its not keepable. On that basis, I vote delete. Spartaz Humbug! 19:11, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * "I believe the article can be expanded." ....... WP:BEBOLD – Davey 2010 Talk 19:40, 27 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I've asked the question about sources and did not get anything. We don't keep articles because someone is listed on IAFD.com. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:44, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Can these interviews be considered valid references? Guilherme Burn (talk) 11:27, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No these interviews are WP:SPIP (self-promotional) sources and are not suitable for bio material, nor for establishing notability. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:22, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete. Porn industry supporting performer awards are not solidly associated with RS coverage, and the sources mentioned by Guilherme Burn are drawn from vendor sites which do not contribute to notability; they are fundamentally promotional and typically lack the factchecking required for BLP references. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006.   (talk) 00:15, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete This porn actress is not notable and fails our too-lenient PORNBIO guideline. Cullen328  Let's discuss it  01:18, 31 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.