Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong | [squeal] || 05:54, 20 November 2019 (UTC)

Monika Gabriela Bartoszewicz

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This appears to fail WP:PROF, with all cited sources being primary or affiliated. Google seems not to suggest anything substantial about the subject, h-index of 3 and i10-index of 1, total 31 citations since 2014. As far as I can tell she's an early career researcher, and this is WP:TOOSOON by some margin. Article by WP:SPA, Google indicates possible COI. Guy (help!) 09:46, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 10:17, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thsmi002 (talk) 16:03, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete, WP:TOOSOON. Citation counts well below what would be needed for WP:PROF and one edited volume well below what would be needed for WP:AUTHOR (instead we would need multiple authored and multiply-reviewed books). —David Eppstein (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete this vastly bloated BLP with tiny academic impact. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:42, 14 November 2019 (UTC).
 * Weak delete as the nominator said, but I think in the future might be qualified MenfesKidus40 (talk) 01:44, 20 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.