Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Jeanne Morrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 04:10, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Monique Jeanne Morrow

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Written like a resume, this person is relatively senior within Cisco but that doesn't make her notable enough for an encyclopedia article IMO Gbawden (talk) 07:48, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. This is a recreation of a page already deleted: "Nick-D (talk | contribs) deleted page Monique Jeanne Morrow (A7: No explanation of significance (real person/animal/organization/web content/organized event): No clear claim of notability or references attesting to this)" (see log). I agree with the nom that this article has promotional, CV-ish, non-encyclopedic tone and fails to justify WP:N/WP:BIO. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:34, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 06:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)




 * Delete - has significant coverage and may be marginally reliable. We need multiple source and the others do not qualify. I didn't find anything usable on Google News or Highbeam. ~KvnG 02:53, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.