Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monique Leslie Akassi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 05:31, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Monique Leslie Akassi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A biography of a non-notable academic. I have failed to find any independent sources discussing her. The only significant contributor is User:Dr.Monique.Akassi, so it is most likely an autobiography for self-promotion. Other users performed only trivial maintenance tasks and removal of blatant promotion. The only reference/external link is to her website, but that still blocks a BLP PROD as I understand it. BethNaught (talk) 21:27, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 12 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Assistant professors are rarely notable and, with zero cites on GS, this one is no exception. Xxanthippe (talk) 23:50, 12 April 2014 (UTC).
 * Delete. Does not seem to pass notability requirements under WP:PROF or WP:BIO. Subject has potential; article created too early.--Eric Yurken (talk) 14:35, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. The article contains no evidence of passing any of the WP:PROF criteria, and the circumstances within the article (e.g. her relatively junior status in academia) make a pass unlikely. —David Eppstein (talk) 22:10, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.