Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey Boards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. postdlf (talk) 01:45, 6 May 2011 (UTC)

Monkey Boards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No reliable third-party sources to show the notability of the subject. MyBBCoder (talk) 10:04, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Per above. I think it borders NOTADVERTISING for the way it reads (to me, at least). Also, every creation under the sun can't have it own article, even if the creator believes it deserves one. - Bkid My talk/Contribs 11:02, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 30 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is shareware. It is not invisible on Google.  Nipson anomhmata   (Talk) 23:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not seeing any sources. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:11, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unsourced.  This is as cut and dry as it gets.  coccyx bloccyx  (toccyx)  23:14, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete At best, might get a mention in some other article, but clearly not independently notable enough by any source outside. W Nowicki (talk) 17:29, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.