Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey Gone Mad


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 11:01, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Monkey Gone Mad

 * — (View AfD)
 * — (View AfD)
 * — (View AfD)

Fails WP:BAND. All information appears to come from the band's own website. ShadowHalo 01:04, 16 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete all or speedy delete all per nomination. Away with ye, come back when you're famous! Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. I'm not so sure this isn't a speedy candidate. -- Kicking222 01:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom.--Grand Slam 7 01:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. Albums appear to be self-released. No hits on Amazon.com or CDBaby. They have only been "playing local parties and then hosting their own shows in local venues". Therefore, no indication they would pass WP:MUSIC. Ohconfucius 02:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete al per nom. Not notable at all. TSO1D 02:37, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all, fails WP:MUSIC as a walled garden of non-notable band and album information. -- Kinu t /c  02:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom.-K37 02:58, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. MER-C 03:12, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all as insufficiently notable per WP:BAND. -- Satori Son 04:29, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. I completely agree, this totally fails WP:MUSIC. --  K yo cat  ¿Quíeres hablar? 04:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all WP:VANITY Malla  nox  05:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per every reason above. Sr13 05:59, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all utter failure WP:BAND--John Lake 06:16, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * "Speedy Delete all - or Delete if this fails CSD criteria for some reason. I don't even see an ASSERTION of notability in there, though, so I think this can be speedied. Perel 07:35, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * I figured the side projects, albums, and being featured on a compilation with very notable artists could be construed as assertions (even if they don't succeed at doing so). —ShadowHalo 07:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all- non notable, and reasons listed in the comments above.  Cat tleG irl  '' talk 10:20, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete all does not meet WP:MUSIC requirements and no real assertions of notability. Plus with no hits on Amazon or CDBaby, as mentioned above, does indicate more signs of non-notability.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk)  16:44, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all - The consensus so far appears to be delete every Wikipedia independent topic related to Monkey Gone Mad. I found a few more Category:Monkey Gone Mad images, Category:Monkey Gone Mad albums, and Category:Monkey Gone Mad.  If there are others, I assume that the administrator will delete them as well.  As for my delete vote, only notices regarding the appearances of Monkey Gone Mad have made it to the newspapers; nothing about the formation of the group or the history of the group.  Monkey Gone Mad really need to start releasing PRs so that newspapers will cover them better.  If they eventually make the newspapers, there might be enough information to sustain an independent Wikipedia article on Monkey Gone Mad. As part of the deletion, it would be kind of an editor to list Monkey Gone Mad within an appropriate article.  I tried to, but couldn't figure out where they could be listed.-- Jreferee 17:36, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom; fails WP:BAND too.  (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Delete, and Delete no assertion of notability. WVhybrid 05:30, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom.  S h a r k f a c e  2 1 7  06:00, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, too much first hand info ("the band states", etc.) Milto LOL pia 03:05, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.