Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkeybicycle (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Hers fold  non-admin (t/a/c) 07:01, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Monkeybicycle
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

No third-party evidence of notability for this publication. OhNo itsJamie Talk 21:12, 7 October 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:54, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:17, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete No non-trivial sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 01:30, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Notable publication of work from notable authors. ChildofMidnight (talk) 22:00, 15 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep - the article makes no direct assertion of notability but I think it's capable of making that assertion as it features publications by notable authors. There's plenty of ghits, comprising both reviews, recommendation, and discussion of both the site and the publication.  Assertable notability plus secondary sources equals a pass for WP:N, so keep. - DustFormsWords (talk) 02:32, 21 October 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.