Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monmouth Film Festival


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:17, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

Monmouth Film Festival

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Deprodded without improvement, with the rationale, "issues with claims of "advertising" are best dealt with using a technique called :editing" (rather than "deletion")".

Local festival. While it receives local coverage, fails WP:ORGDEPTH.  Onel 5969  TT me 04:25, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:49, 17 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Local event that does not rise to the level of WP:GNG. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 05:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)
 * Soft delete as this looks plausibly to be a case of WP:TOOSOON. The only substantive coverage of the festival itself I found when I went looking for sources is either from small local papers or not independent of the festival. A shame (or someone else) hasn't yet removed some of the promotional tone, but that may be moot if nobody wants to work on a draftified copy of the article. — GrammarFascist   contribs talk 03:09, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * , you might want to take a look at this edit, in terms of promotional tone. Alansohn (talk) 03:31, 21 August 2017 (UTC)
 * That edit took out some of the worst of the promotional tone and content,, but plenty still remains, making the article look more like a travel brochure than an encyclopedia article in places. I don't consider promotional tone necessarily a deletion-worthy offense, but the article currently fails the WP:GNG, and that's what I based my !vote on. — GrammarFascist  contribs talk 04:00, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.