Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MonoX


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 02:07, 19 December 2008 (UTC)

MonoX

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No evidence of notability given. --fvw *  10:07, 9 December 2008 (UTC) 
 * More content and more secondary references than many of the articles in the "parent" article List of content management systems Monosoftware (talk) 13:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC) — Monosoftware (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * That doesn't mean that this article is notable. It just means that no one bothered to nominate the crappy articles in that list for deletion. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 17:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 21:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 00:51, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. A quick Google news search turned up lots of hits for "MonoX", but none that I could see were related to this piece of software. I don't think it's going to be possible to establish notablity.  Linguist At Large  04:24, 14 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Doesn't show notability per WP:NOTABILITY. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 17:03, 14 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.