Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mono En Stereo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 21:03, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

Mono En Stereo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article stretches the rules for promotion and inherited notability. While he has a lot of production credits, almost all of the sources in the article are about records that he produced, and he is generally listed briefly as the producer or not mentioned at all. The sources that are about him specifically are almost entirely routine listings at self-promotional and retail/streaming sites. The article has one supported statement on how he was mentioned briefly by NYT:, and he did get one moderately robust interview:. (Those two sources are already in the article.) Otherwise, there is not enough reliable and significant coverage that is specifically about him and his work, which is evident after searches under all of his many professional names. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:18, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 15:19, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 20:23, 20 February 2019 (UTC)


 * DELETE Totally agree. Doesn't meet WP:MUSIC notoriety and seems promotional. Actaudio (talk) 05:41, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete All I could find were press releases or false positives of the Dutch "Mono en Stereo", nothing else. Without sources, I can't salvage this, and a passing mention in the NYT isn't enough. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  21:33, 23 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.