Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monogamous Gay Australia


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 17:39, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Monogamous Gay Australia

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

no evidence for notability from a RS.  DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)  DGG ( talk ) 16:18, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Courcelles 17:19, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 17:25, 30 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep, organization appears to have stimulated both controversy and commentary from across multiple different types of sources. &mdash; Cirt (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Hi Cirt. Could you post some of the sources covering the group and/ or the controversy about it? I wasn't able to find much. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 02:37, 3 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. It seems to have only attracted the attention of one news organisation.  This means it would fail the significant coverage criteria and is therefore not notable. - Shiftchange (talk) 14:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 02:05, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:08, 14 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. No sustained notability. Nsw2042 (talk) 13:08, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.