Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monostringism

Monostringism
Probable nonsense. Zero Google hits. Could probably be speedied. --Kelly Martin 01:28, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as rambling deep [sic] thoughts. Wyss 02:28, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * The original author vandalised the notice.  I've restored it.  The article is unsubstantiated gibberish that resembles Plutonium Atom Totality Theory updated for 21st century Physics.  Delete. Uncle G 02:43, 2005 Jan 10 (UTC)
 * Delete unless Kenneth tells me what the frequency is. Starblind 03:16, Jan 10, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This has got to be gibberish. -- Walt Pohl 06:48, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment. This is an interesting case of literarism. The process is as follow: in order to clarify a smoky pseudo-theory, establish a comparison with some scientific findings/theory/words. But... one can clarify something only if what is used in the comparison, is clear to all. In that case, the string and super-string astrophysical theory, is likely to be totally unknown by the author as well as audience. Result: the comparison darkens everything (and lowers credibility if there was any). Gtabary 11:29, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. A funny joke, or a bad essay. Gtabary 11:29, 10 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * String theory is a serious, but still controversial, theory of sub-atomic physics. This is crap.  Delete.  Edeans 03:52, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)